<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://draft.blogger.com/navbar/4789052980174302659?origin\x3dhttps://lotsofjelly.blogspot.com', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>
Navigation
Find your way home.

HomePosts

Webmistress
learn about me.

Name: Sarah.
Age: 22.
Location: UK.

I'm in a long term relationship.

Human Rights
Animal Rights
Intactivist
Hammers Fan
Gay Rights
Feminist
Theist (Christian)
BNF Collector
Liberal

I'm the proud mummy of 3 Degu boys, Dougal, Jack and Teddy. (RIP Dylan and Henry my beautiful boys)

About
What I write about

This is more a random blog or my um..random thought's and ramblings. I also have 2 other blogs on blogger/blogspot which are more specific (they are linked below) Please note that these are my opinions, and things in my culture/life. If you are unhappy at any point you can leave. Comments which are abusive to anyone will be deleted. Thanks for your cooperation!

Wishlist
wish upon a star.

End to Routine Infant circumcision (for non-medical reasons)
A new blogskin
Chocolate Cake


Links
visit them too.

Not yet a Mother
Parenthood from the point of view of a not yet parent!

Disney Princesses
My research surrounding Disney princesses and the controversy, up and downs.

Archives
instant time machine

September 2012
October 2012
August 2013


Credits
Visit the blogskin designer

Designer: QING
Codings: Nicole
Graphics & Inspirations: Sipei
Colors: Color Combos


List of posts
Quick View

Intactivism
Blue Nose Friends
Art and free expression
General Interest

Intactivism

I'm not the one with the Fetish
Where your religious rights stop


Menu


Blue nose friends

None :(

Menu


Art and free expression

Are you using the correct medium?

Menu


General Interest

Albinism in horses
Heart = Love
Why I don't identify myself as "Christian"

Menu
Intactivism: I'm not the one with the fetish
Saturday, 22 September 2012 @ 20:08

I prefer intact men, I admit it. It's not why I'm an intactivist, but it is a fact about me regardless. Often pro-circ people will refer to this as having a "foreskin fetish", Personally I think those who prefer cut men have a "genital mutilation fetish", to each their own...

I grew up in the UK,  born and raised. In the UK most men are intact (about 85%), so the majority of penises I saw were intact.

When I first saw a circumcised penis I was a little taken aback by it. An intact penis can look similar to a circumcised one when the foreskin is retracted, but it's still different. The first thing I noticed was the colour, it was dull and off colour, a kind of grey tint, it looked unhealthy and odd to me. The next thing I noticed was that the glans were dry and rough, and then my eyes were drawn to the scar, in the same place the foreskin would be rolled back to in an intact man. I didn't think it was better looking at all.

I like intact penises. I like the way they feel and look, they feel smooth and moist, it feels nice to touch. They look a healthy pink colour. I like the feel in every way, in my hand, in my mouth, it felt nice and smooth to have in your mouth. I hated having the circumcised one in my mouth, it was rough and dry, it felt horrible on my tongue, I didn't enjoy the experience.

The idea that liking intact penises and natural sex is a fetish baffles me. I'm not obsessed with foreskin, I just prefer my men with all the penis they were born with, I don't like the idea that someone has been mutilated, with the exception of when they choose to do it. When I see a circumcised penis I see a penis will a missing part, I've never seen one and thought "that looks so much better". Genital mutilation doesn't turn me on, mutilated genitals don't turn me on, the idea that someone has a missing part doesn't turn me on, the scars, rough and dry glans don't turn me on - if it did that would be a fetish.

What does turn me on is whole men, with fully functional penises, just like nature intended. Nature intended me to enjoy natural sex. There is no "fetish" in this, it's natural, it's what is intended.

When someone tells me they prefer circumcised guys, I don't tell them they obviously just have a fetish, I respect that they are different to me, but I don't appreciate people telling me that just because I enjoy natural sex and like natural penises, I have a "foreskin fetish" that's uncalled for, and like I said, who is the one with the fetish here?

In short; I like them natural, people who like circumcised penises like them with a missing part, which one sounds more like a fetish to you? I know which it is for me!

posted by lbftw  


0 Comments

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home